Author Archives: Tegan Darnell

About Tegan Darnell

Librarian, USQ Doctoral student, and the Principal Editor of ReDBlog. Tegan's research topic for the Doctor of Professional Studies is how librarians’ narratives inhibit or create preferred library futures, and creating spaces for librarian transformation.

The tyranny of distance

By Ruth Fielder

Another ReDTrain email arrived yesterday.

These emails arrive so regularly I could set my alarm to their arrival, but it is an alarm I could do without. The ReDTrain alarm is a bitter-sweet reminder of how far I live from campus: and it makes me feel lonely because I want to be with other PhD-ers. But being on campus is not an option for now. This is a third or fourth-hand story of another external PhD candidate’s (Ahhh*) battle with the tyranny of distance, and was shared by a fellow external PhD candidate (Jeezz*).

Ahhh lives in the deep tropical rainforest of far North Queensland. Ahhh’s problem was that his PhD was based in Toowoomba and he was allergic to cold westerly winds. So allergic, that his eyes and nose would run at the mere thought of cold or westerlies. The only viable way do the PhD was to enrol in an external program.

There were some good reasons to study off campus: no on-campus distractions, and he was still surrounded by the world he loved and knew. Supervision was via Zoom. Emails were a great way to ask quick questions The supervisor gave Ahhh her private phone number, so that when weekend supervision was needed or the unstable internet connection was down so he could stay in touch. Ahhh felt like part of a big fuzzy community.

One day, Ahhh was seized by panic and lost confidence. There was no way that this PhD would be a success. ReDTrain notices were informing him of candidates’ topics and by comparison, his topic was vague. It did not have real word application. It was insignificant. It was boring. His supervisor suggested that a face-to-face meeting and a week long campus visit was in order. So, Ahhh reluctantly made the flight bookings and drove 300kms to the closest airport. He was glad it was summer in Toowoomba–-the cold would not threaten his health.

Ahhh was taken back by not only the beauty of the Toowoomba Campus, but communication with his supervisors was much easier and productive. Face-to-face conversations flowed more easily than Zoom conversations, and responses to questions and ideas were instantaneous compared to email. He got more done in five days on campus than a month at home.
Rather than a distraction, campus activities added the richness of his on-campus time. It was not home, but he still managed a laugh or two while having a cuppa and lunch with Jeezz and others. Parting from campus was tinged with a little sadness and longing to return. He even experienced a twinge of jealously toward on-campus candidate.

I got a lot out of Ahhh’s story.

While external study has its perks, and zoom meetings and emails are critical for progress, extended campus visits are invaluable. And who knows, I may even make some lifetime friends. The ReDTrain alarm is no longer a bittersweet reminder of the tyranny of distance, but rather it keeps in me focused and serves to remind me of the fuzzy community I have decided to join.

* To protect the identity of candidates’ these are not their real names.

eResearch and Librarians

By Robyn Edmanson

As a librarian I’m interested in the future skills we need to support researchers. In the past decade, eResearch practices and processes have evolved along with library support services.

eResearch is:

‘research activities that use a spectrum of advanced information and communication technologies and that embrace new research methodologies emerging from increasing access to advanced networks, services and tool’

from The Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations 2006

Since then, eResearch has grown both locally and internationally alongside the portability and sophistication of ICTs.

So too data collections, sample sizes and data management practices have evolved and improved as researchers, and librarians supporting their work, have come to grips with new skill-sets surrounding five key areas:

  1. Collaborative technologies: IM, Sharepoint, Google Tools, Social Bookmarking, new video conferencing technologies such as zoom
  2. Research data management: experimental, observational and/ computational data; data storage and curation; derived data and more
  3. Scholarly communication: Endnote, Zotero, Refworks, Mendeley; Creative Commons licensing; electronic publishing – both Open Access and subscriber; bibliometrics & altmetrics; institutional repositories; author identifiers, e.g. ORCID ID, Researcher ID.
  4. Visualisation: Learning Analytics and dashboards
  5. Data collection & analysis: qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods analyses, data mining, programming languages such as R and Python for meaningful information.

While librarians’ skills have evolved with advances in these key areas, data analysis is a new and exciting area of eResearch involving open-source software and a new digital mindset. The automation requirements of a lot of eResearch projects require programming and analysis skills which is where librarians can help with a new Library Carpentry Toolbox supported by the Australian National Data Service (ANDS).

Software training for librarians is an important new tool made possible with open source technology; important new skills to safeguard against data loss, enable data re-use and ensure against copyright mismanagement.

Editors Note: USQ eResearch is running ‘Software Carpentry’ sessions on the 18th -19th July 2016. Find out more about ‘Software Carpentry’ here.

My first marking experience

By Ruth Wagstaff

The first time as a marker can be daunting.  At least that is how I found it.  I have spoken to other PhD candidates who took to marking like a duck takes to water, and I am the first to admit  I have a lot to learn from the marking “ducks”.  But this blog is not for the marking ducks.  This blog is for those feeling daunted by the prospect of marking.   It is a reflection of my first marking experience, the strategies that I would use next time round, and proof that it is possible survive and thrive.

Not every essay will be easily understood.  Sounds obvious.  The undergraduate essay is designed to allow the marker to see how a student is thinking and is linking concepts.  Essay writing is a complex skill, and it is not uncommon for literacy skills to suffer as students take their first steps in writing an academic paper.  The end result is that the argument can be as difficult to find as car keys tossed aside because one was too busy to put them in their usual place.

Strategy – have realistic expectations of essay standards .

Marking can be mentally draining.  That shouldn’t have come a surprise.  But did.  It took a lot of concentration to understand the essays, to assist with helpful comments,  and grade according to the marking criteria.

Strategy – take breaks, do some weeding, have a cuppa, and ring a friend for a quick chat.

Marking is not a walk in the park.  I had a visions marking while relaxing outside in the sun–a cuppa in one hand, and the other tapping out helpful comments.  Reality was very different– I was inside, stressed, and wondering why had I said yes.  And why was I stressed?  I didn’t understand role as a marker, and what was expected of me.

Strategy – ask the lecturer questions about anything related to the marking, and be honest with how I am coping.

Navigating new UConnect tabs can be like opening up treasure chest or Pandora’s box.  I have a confession. I thought I would be an expert at navigating UTeach.  I am an expert at JustU, ULearn, and  UAsk.  But, quickly realised that I was no expert because I could not find the link to access the assignments.  I had visions of crashing the USQ computer systems and deleting vital student information. (Have I mentioned I have a tendency to catastrophise?)  Once I finally admitted that  The Markers Guide was making no sense, I sent an urgent SOS to the lecturer.  The lecturer made one phone call,  the problem was identified, and in less than five minutes I had all the access I needed.

Strategy – forget pride, and ask for help because I am not expected to know everything.

So, my first marking experience was characterised valuable lessons about expectations, being kind to self, and that I have a tendency to catastrophise. I was also reminded me of the incredible resource that we have in USQ staff.  It was no walk in the park, but it was a worthwhile experience  And yes – I will do it again and put the strategies into action.

The Wandering Researcher

By Jenny Olson

Hello fellow researchers,

I am a PhD candidate and the focus of my research is active lifestyles in regional Australia.  My mixed-methods research is taking place in inner-regional Southern Queensland.  I am really enjoying learning about the lifestyles of people in these regional communities.  The challenge for me is that I don’t exactly live in the environment where my research is being conducted.  In fact, I live some distance away … in Japan.

I am quite accustomed to life as a distance student. My undergraduate studies were also undertaken at USQ in external mode, while I worked full-time on the Gold Coast.  I moved to Japan at the beginning of my Honours year as a result of my husband’s work.  As an undergraduate I had access to the Study Desk, which facilitated regular communication with my fellow students and my lecturers.  I relied heavily on the online forums for academic guidance, but also for social support.  I felt part of a virtual community.  So many resources were available from the Study Desk.  Every learning style catered for.  It was truly a wonderful experience.

In the early stages of my PhD I struggled a little bit with the absence of my old friend the Study Desk.  Yes, technically it still exists, but in a necessarily different form, with the absence of the structure provided by weekly topics that are relevant to course work.  Most importantly, the previously relied upon avenue for social support was missing.  After a few months I was really missing the connection with others.  Suddenly Japan seemed a lonelier place than it had before.  I started to wonder if I could really get through the long slog, and whether my research area was worthwhile – some classic ‘Imposter Syndrome’ thinking (The Thesis Whisperer, 2015) came in to play.

After a rough few weeks I decided that it was time to help myself.  I had a trip to Australia planned in the coming weeks, and I decided to make the most of it.  I booked a meeting with the student counsellor at Springfield.  I planned a number of meetings with my supervisors and others, to talk about aspects of my research.  The most important thing I did though, was to reach out to some of the other PhD students working within my team (Innovative Mental Health Solutions).  I set up a lunch meeting at the Tavern near the Springfield campus.  My world opened up.  We shared professional knowledge.  We shared personal stories.  We encouraged each other.  I had found the social support that I was missing.  I realized I was not alone.

I came back home to Japan, and my PhD world seemed much brighter.  I regained the belief that my research was worthwhile, and that I had the skills and wherewithal to see it through.  I also knew that ongoing social support was going to be critical to my success.  I kept in touch with my fellow students by email, Skype and Facebook.  I arrange social lunches and coffee when I am in town.  I also decided to get involved with the Postgraduate Research Student Society (PReSS) as an executive member of the club, with a focus on advocating for the needs of external students like myself.  (PReSS is a club for all postgraduate research students at USQ.  For more information please email PReSSclub@usq.edu.au)

I also try to be more active on social media.  I joined the PhD Owls group on Facebook (for older wiser learners).  I am still mastering the art of Twitter (@JennyLOlson) and LinkedIn but am finding them to be a useful way to connect with a broad range of like-minded people.  I have also discovered that Twitter is an excellent way of keeping up with new publications/research in my area of interest.  I would love to connect with any fellow research students through these mediums, so please reach out.  As a keen amateur photographer I also have an account on Instagram (the_wandering_researcher).  I do believe it is important to maintain interests beyond that of our research, for our mental health, and for the perspective on our research that can only be obtained by stepping away from time to time.

On the subject of stepping away, I have been fortunate enough to have had the opportunity to travel on a number of occasions over the past year.  This has led to a bit of a juggling act on occasions.  Much of my research has been conducted in airports, on planes, and in hotel rooms (particularly in the middle of the night if I am jet lagged).  This has taught me to manage my time, whilst still taking time out for the fun stuff.  I have also learnt that even a 5-minute window of time can provide the opportunity to tick off a job on the never ending to-do list that we all have.   Sure, there are times when I need to sit for longer periods and write.  But a lot can be achieved in the shorter windows of time as well.

Overall, I have learnt that the experience of a wandering researcher need not be a lonely one.  I am so grateful to my supervisors, fellow PhD students, and many of the staff (both professional and academic) who have provided professional support as well as social connections that have significantly enhanced my experience of higher degree research.

Data Management

By Robyn Edmanson

As an information professional and fledgling researcher, I care about data management.

Why?

Because funding agencies, journals, and other stakeholders increasingly require you and I, the data producers, to share, archive, and plan for the management of our data. We need data management and curation knowledge and skills that support the long-term preservation, access, and reuse of data.

Effectively managing data also helps to optimise research output; increase research impact; and support open scientific inquiry.

I’m doing the Australian National Data Service’s 23 (research data) Things training to help me manage our research data throughout the entire data lifecycle from project planning to the end of the project when data ideally are shared and made available. Not simply stored on the mercurial USB, but in a trustworthy repository such as QRISCloud which is QCIF’s (Queensland Cyber Infrastructure Foundations) trusted online repository.

To Mark or Not to Mark: That is the Question

By Ruth Wagstaff

Wow! An invitation to mark real undergraduate papers was on the top of my daily emails.  I knew at some point in my PhD I would mark.  It just seems to go with the territory of being a PhD candidate.  Now I was face to face with the big question,”To mark or not to mark?”.  I decided to take on the challenge, and in the process learnt that there is a time for marking and a time not for marking.

In all honesty, I took on the marking because I needed money.  Marking offers a good hourly rate.  I dropped from a 5 to 4 day working week so I did not go insane while juggling work, family, the dog, and study.  This one job would make up for wages lost, so I felt like I  had nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Besides, the contract said that I could mark an allotted number of papers in a set time frame, and I knew that with clever time management I would have no problems fitting the marking into my already tight schedule.  I figured that if a paper or two took longer than the allocated time, I could order a home delivered pizza, and the dog could wait for her walk for a few days.  I was absolutely convinced that I had the time.  I had to have the time because I needed the money

Once the marking started, I went into panic mode.  I felt very inadequate.  The time to mark a paper sometimes took two to three times  longer than the allotted marking time.  Not only did the dog missed her walks, I ate several home delivered pizzas, and the washing was thrown into the dryer.  You see, when I start to learn a new skill, it takes me far longer to carry out the task than someone already experienced.  I did get faster at marking, but it still took me longer than the allotted time.

Marking is a skill that PhD students need to learn.  It is part of our apprenticeship. I also believe that ultimately, it will help me become a better writer.  I am unlikely to do mark again until I am a full-time on-campus student, but, I will mark again and the dog will have less walks, I will eat home delivered pizza, and the clothes will go through the dryer.

So, what is my answer to the marking question?  My answer is do not mark only because you need the money, because if time is money, there better ways to make it.  Mark because it is an essential skill to  acquire, and will ultimately assist in your own development as an academic writer .

 

Juggling

By Jeff Gough

Sometimes, the hardest part about doing a PhD, is not really the PhD.

For me, as the sole provider for a family of two adults, three children (including a teenager) and a mortgage, the greatest pressure comes in the attempt to balance the need to work, the demands of family, and the desire to do research. It is a real juggling act to keep all of the balls in the air at the same time.

Initially I thought working fulltime as a Research Associate would be a great way to earn an income during my PhD and be a wonderful adjunct to my learning, and in many ways it has. I am eternally grateful for the experience. The insights and knowledge I have gained into the real world of the researcher has been invaluable and has fore-armed me against many pitfalls. However, coming home after a full day of research, doesn’t make you conducent to sitting down and doing more research. Especially if they are quite different areas of study.

Add to this the reality that your kids want to interact with you when they see you, because that’s what families do, so you still need to pick up some of the parenting duties. Along with the handyman requirements that keep the household operational.  And the end result is that you have intensely conflicting demands on your time.

Sure, you can say you’ll get some PhD stuff done after the kids have gone to bed, but let’s face it, once you’ve wound down for the day, it’s hard to get wound back up again. Motivation is like the cat of human behaviour. It does what it wants, doesn’t come unless it feels like it, can never be found when you’re looking for it and turns up for some attention when you’re busy doing something else.

While the idea of working to support your knowledge addiction is fundamentally brilliant, the reality is far less grandiose. I can’t describe how envious (and guilty) I feel sometimes when I walk past the PhD room and see the students in there, all working diligently on their respective Theses, knowing that I’m only attending to mine for a few hours a week.

However, another round of scholarships has just closed and my application is in. I’m hoping to be successful this time around. In the end though, I can’t rely on that to be the case, because in the back of my mind hides the thought that my work contract ends in September. Well, the thought isn’t really hiding there so much as its presence is being ignored, in the vain hope that the thought will get bored and go away.

In the event that things go pear-shaped, instead of the cherry shape that I’m hoping for, contingency plans need to be made. My degree is in psych, so I’m redeveloping the thought workshops I trailed last year into a set of formal seminars to take to the market place. So in addition to work, and family, and study, I’m attempting to start a business to help replace the work I will lose in September. I need to up my presentation skills a bit though, so I’m also engaged in a short series of presentation workshops learning how to work in front of a camera (something I find far more anxiety inducing than working in front of people). Of course, there is an opportunity to do actual paid work from this as well. Another possible avenue for income later in the year.

Oh, did I mention that I also organise the Brisbane part of a worldwide charity event which happens at the end of September every year, raising money for men’s health issues ($2m we raised last year for prostate cancer research). Plus I’m hoping to do my Confirmation in November. The back half of this year is going to be bigger than ten big bears.

Usually when I tell people all of this, they just stare blankly at me and sometimes offer an opinion that starts with ‘F’ and ends with ‘that’. To be honest, if you had have told me 5 years ago that I’d be doing all of this, I probably would have offered the same opinion. The question, ‘How do you manage’ is one that falls out of people’s faces sometimes when they’ve shaken their head back and forward for long enough.

The truth is, I don’t know. There is no secret to making life work, you just do it. You do it because you have to, because the alternative is doing nothing and where’s the future in that? I think about the things I need to do, but I try not to dwell on them. I try to engage my curiosity such that I work on the logistical aspect of it all, on the puzzle of making the pieces fit. A curiosity about the challenge and finding the solution. After all, I’m training to be a researcher, curiosity is part of who I am.

On the flip side, I try not to over-think it. Identify what needs to be done, acknowledge that it’s huge and daunting and anxiety inducing, and then just do it anyway. The most important aspect I think though that gets me through, is that in the end it all means something. I’m not doing this for someone else, I’m doing this for me.

Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche once said, “He who has a why to live for, can bear almost any how”. You can endure exceptional circumstances, if what you are doing has meaning for you.

When it gets too much, look inside, find the reason why you are doing this and then give it a hug.